CVE-2024-55655Low▾ Sunlitsigstore has insufficient validation of integration timestamp during verification
▾ Sunlit zone — Low / medium · no exploitation signal
impact 13.8 · likelihood 0.1 · exploitation 0
Need a working PoC? Pro members can cast a request and our team develops one — it lands right here.
Exploit-prediction probability, daily snapshots since Jul 8.
Disclosure to exploitation, from the record and what we observed since indexing it.
Disclosed via OSV
0.2%
Last analysed / modified upstream
0.2% → 0.3%
Versions of sigstore-python newer than 2.0.0 but prior to 3.6.0 perform insufficient validation of the "integration time" present in "v2" and "v3" bundles during the verification flow: the "integration time" is verified if a source of signed time (such as an inclusion promise) is present, but is otherwise trusted if no source of signed time is present.
This does not affect "v1" bundles, as the "v1" bundle format always requires an inclusion promise.
Sigstore uses signed time to support verification of signatures made against short-lived signing keys.
The impact and severity of this weakness is low, as Sigstore contains multiple other enforcing components that prevent an attacker who modifies the integration timestamp within a bundle from impersonating a valid signature. In particular, an attacker who modifies the integration timestamp can induce a Denial of Service, but in no different manner than already possible with bundle access (e.g. modifying the signature itself such that it fails to verify).
Separately, an attacker could upload a new entry to the transparency service, and substitute their new entry's time. However, this would still be rejected at validation time, as the new entry's (valid) signed time would be outside the validity window of the original signing certificate and would nonetheless render the attacker auditable.
sigstore >= 2.0.0, < 3.6.0Upgrade to a patched release:
sigstore 3.6.0Connected by shared product, vendor, weakness, or advisory.
CVE-2026-24408None· 0.0sigstore CSRF possibility in OIDC authentication during signing
CVE-2024-29902Medium· 4.2Cosign malicious attachments can cause system-wide denial of service
CVE-2026-44309Medium· 5.3gitsign verify accepts signatures over go-git-normalized bytes, enabling trust confusion on malformed commits
CVE-2026-44310Medium· 5.4gitsign --verify panics on empty-certificate PKCS7 and exits 0, bypassing exit-code callers
CVE-2022-35930High· 7.1PolicyController before 0.2.1 may bypass attestation verification
CVE-2026-22772Medium· 5.8Fulcio is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via MetaIssuer Regex Bypass