CVE-2024-29902Medium· 4.2▾ SunlitCosign malicious attachments can cause system-wide denial of service
▾ Sunlit zone — Low / medium · no exploitation signal
impact 23.1 · likelihood 0.1 · exploitation 0
Need a working PoC? Pro members can cast a request and our team develops one — it lands right here.
Exploit-prediction probability, daily snapshots since Sep 12.
Disclosure to exploitation, from the record and what we observed since indexing it.
Disclosed via OSV
Last analysed / modified upstream
0.7%
A remote image with a malicious attachment can cause denial of service of the host machine running Cosign. This can impact other services on the machine that rely on having memory available such as a Redis database which can result in data loss. It can also impact the availability of other services on the machine that will not be available for the duration of the machine denial.
The root cause of this issue is that Cosign reads the attachment from a remote image entirely into memory without checking the size of the attachment first. As such, a large attachment can make Cosign read a large attachment into memory; If the attachments size is larger than the machine has memory available, the machine will be denied of service. The Go runtime will make a SIGKILL after a few seconds of system-wide denial.
The root cause is that Cosign reads the contents of the attachments entirely into memory on line 238 below:
...and prior to that, neither Cosign nor go-containerregistry checks the size of the attachment and enforces a max cap. In the case of a remote layer of f *attached, go-containerregistry will invoke this API:
func (rl *remoteLayer) Compressed() (io.ReadCloser, error) {
// We don't want to log binary layers -- this can break terminals.
ctx := redact.NewContext(rl.ctx, "omitting binary blobs from logs")
return rl.fetcher.fetchBlob(ctx, verify.SizeUnknown, rl.digest)
}
Notice that the second argument to rl.fetcher.fetchBlob is verify.SizeUnknown which results in not using the io.LimitReader in verify.ReadCloser:
https://github.com/google/go-containerregistry/blob/a0658aa1d0cc7a7f1bcc4a3af9155335b6943f40/internal/verify/verify.go#L82-L100
func ReadCloser(r io.ReadCloser, size int64, h v1.Hash) (io.ReadCloser, error) {
w, err := v1.Hasher(h.Algorithm)
if err != nil {
return nil, err
}
r2 := io.TeeReader(r, w) // pass all writes to the hasher.
if size != SizeUnknown {
r2 = io.LimitReader(r2, size) // if we know the size, limit to that size.
}
return &and.ReadCloser{
Reader: &verifyReader{
inner: r2,
hasher: w,
expected: h,
wantSize: size,
},
CloseFunc: r.Close,
}, nil
}
This issue can allow a supply-chain escalation from a compromised registry to the Cosign user: If an attacher has compromised a registry or the account of an image vendor, they can include a malicious attachment and hurt the image consumer.
Update to the latest version of Cosign, which limits the number of attachments. An environment variable can override this value.
github.com/sigstore/cosign <= 2.2.3github.com/sigstore/cosign/v2 < 2.2.4Upgrade to a patched release:
github.com/sigstore/cosign/v2 2.2.4Connected by shared product, vendor, weakness, or advisory.
CVE-2026-22703Medium· 5.5Cosign verification accepts any valid Rekor entry under certain conditions
CVE-2026-44309Medium· 5.3gitsign verify accepts signatures over go-git-normalized bytes, enabling trust confusion on malformed commits
CVE-2026-44310Medium· 5.4gitsign --verify panics on empty-certificate PKCS7 and exits 0, bypassing exit-code callers
CVE-2022-35930High· 7.1PolicyController before 0.2.1 may bypass attestation verification
CVE-2026-22772Medium· 5.8Fulcio is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via MetaIssuer Regex Bypass
CVE-2025-66564High· 7.5Sigstore Timestamp Authority allocates excessive memory during request parsing