RUSTSEC-2026-0337High· 7.5▾ TwilightPoly1305 panics or computes a wrong tag on attacker-chosen messages of 64 bytes or more
▾ Twilight zone — High severity, or a signal on a lesser flaw
impact 41.3 · likelihood 0 · exploitation 0
Need a working PoC? Pro members can cast a request and our team develops one — it lands right here.
Disclosure to exploitation, from the record and what we observed since indexing it.
Disclosed via OSV
Last analysed / modified upstream
Poly1305 in ic-cipher absorbs messages of 64 bytes or more four blocks at
a time, summing four products before one reduction. From 0.2.5 to 0.2.19 the
reduction kept its carries in 32-bit integers, which four summed products can
overflow when the message's bytes are large.
This affects Poly1305 and ChaCha20Poly1305, and everything built on them:
the TLS and QUIC ChaCha20-Poly1305 suites in ic-rustls, HPKE with that
cipher in ic-hpke, and the re-exports in ic-mac and ironcrypto.
What happens depends on how the crate was compiled:
overflow-checks = true) the multiplication panics, and under
panic = "abort" the process ends. The tag is computed over the ciphertext
before it is compared, so this happens before authentication and without
the key: anyone who can deliver a ChaCha20-Poly1305 ciphertext to be opened
can trigger it.Ordinary data does not reach the defect. A message of 0xff bytes does: in
one measurement against 0.2.19, 28 of 500 ChaCha20Poly1305::open_detached
calls on 1,024 bytes of 0xff under random keys and nonces panicked in a
debug build. ChaCha20-Poly1305 derives a new Poly1305 key for every nonce, so
each message is a fresh attempt.
AES-GCM and AES-GCM-SIV are not affected, and neither are messages shorter than 64 bytes.
The flaw was corrected in 0.2.20 by carrying in 64 bits.
It was found by running Project Wycheproof's ChaCha20-Poly1305 test vectors against the library.
ic-cipher >= 0.2.5, < 0.2.20Upgrade to a patched release:
ic-cipher 0.2.20