RUSTSEC-2026-0228Medium· 4.3▾ SunlitNIP-04 parsing amplifies malformed ciphertext memory use
▾ Sunlit zone — Low / medium · no exploitation signal
impact 23.7 · likelihood 0 · exploitation 0
Need a working PoC? Pro members can cast a request and our team develops one — it lands right here.
Disclosure to exploitation, from the record and what we observed since indexing it.
Disclosed via OSV
Last analysed / modified upstream
The NIP-04 decryption parser split attacker-controlled content on every ?iv=
separator and collected all resulting segments before checking that the message had
the expected two parts. It also Base64-decoded the complete IV text before checking
that it represented the required 16-byte AES-CBC IV.
A malicious sender could include a large number of separators or an oversized IV in an encrypted direct message. Applications that attempted to decrypt the message performed avoidable allocations proportional to the malformed input, with additional allocation amplification from the segment vector and Base64 output. This can consume memory and CPU in clients processing messages received through a relay. It does not weaken NIP-04 encryption or reveal plaintext or key material.
The parser now uses a single bounded split, rejects additional separators, and validates the 24-byte encoded IV length before Base64 decoding. Malformed inputs are returned as errors without allocating for every separator or decoding an arbitrarily large IV.
nostr >= 0.0.0-0, < 0.44.7Upgrade to a patched release:
nostr 0.44.7Connected by shared product, vendor, weakness, or advisory.
RUSTSEC-2026-0230High· 7.5Empty NIP-50 search filters can panic
RUSTSEC-2026-0229High· 7.5NIP-98 authorization parsing permits resource exhaustion
RUSTSEC-2026-0227High· 7.5NIP-44 v2 decryption permits resource exhaustion
RUSTSEC-2026-0226High· 7.5Wallet event parsers accept unauthenticated events
RUSTSEC-2026-0225Medium· 5.5Debug output exposes NIP-46 and NIP-60 credentials
RUSTSEC-2026-0219High· 7.5Remote Denial of Service via malformed NIP-04 IV