GHSA-m687-p538-r5hpHigh▾ TwilightVikunja: Permissive Cross-domain Security Policy trusts every localhost origin which should not be trusted
▾ Twilight zone — High severity, or a signal on a lesser flaw
impact 41.3 · likelihood 0 · exploitation 0
Need a working PoC? Pro members can cast a request and our team develops one — it lands right here.
Vikunja ships with cors.origins defaulting to http://127.0.0.1:* and http://localhost:*, and sends Access-Control-Allow-Credentials: true, so a page served from any port on the user's own machine may make credentialed cross-origin requests to the API and read the responses. The mandatory service.publicurl is appended to that default list rather than replacing it, so a fully configured production deployment still trusts every localhost origin. Combined with the token refresh endpoint, which authenticates with the vikunja_refresh_token cookie and returns a bearer JWT in the response body, one fetch() from such a page yields a working access token for whoever is logged in, and from there the whole account.
cors.enable defaults to true and cors.origins defaults to the two localhost wildcards:
The middleware is registered with AllowCredentials: true and an UnsafeAllowOriginFunc that implements the port wildcard through matchCORSOrigin, since Echo v5 will not accept a wildcard port itself:
The detail that turns a development convenience into a production exposure is the last line of configuration handling. Enabling CORS without a public URL is a fatal error, so every deployment sets one, and that value is appended to the origin list rather than substituted for it:
An operator who configures nothing but their own hostname therefore ends up allowing three origins with credentials: their site, and any port on localhost and 127.0.0.1. There is no supported configuration in which the localhost entries are quietly dropped, and nothing in the logs distinguishes the intended origin from the inherited ones.
The escalation path is the refresh endpoint. It is deliberately unauthenticated because it authenticates with the refresh cookie instead of a bearer token, and it returns the new access token in the JSON body:
The cookie is HttpOnly, but that offers no protection here, because the attacking page never reads the cookie. It issues a credentialed request and the browser attaches the cookie itself. SetRefreshTokenCookie marks the cookie SameSite=None whenever the public URL is https, precisely so the cookie survives split-origin deployments, which is also what allows a cross-site send from a localhost page:
So a single fetch('https://vikunja.example.com/api/v1/user/token/refresh', {method: 'POST', credentials: 'include'}) from any page on any localhost port returns a bearer token for the logged-in user, and the CORS response headers permit the page to read it. The token carries the user's full API authority.
Three files, built together in one directory and run with:
docker build -f Dockerfile -t poc . && docker run --rm poc
Dockerfile builds Vikunja from commit a881ac39eecd07575a5aede8e74727c28d5fd578 and bakes the reproducer in.poc.sh is the entrypoint. It starts the application on sqlite with service.publicurl as the only setting configured, waits for the health check, and runs the exploit.exploit.py registers a user, logs them in, then acts as a page on http://localhost:31337: it reads the refresh cookie attributes, sends the CORS preflight, makes the credentialed refresh request, and asks the API who the returned token belongs to.Nothing is stubbed and no internal function is called; everything after startup is ordinary HTTP against the running application. In the output [+] lines are measured checks and [*] lines are commentary, so only the checks and the final verdict are evidence.
A run against a881ac39eecd07575a5aede8e74727c28d5fd578 prints:
[*] Vikunja built from commit a881ac39ee, sqlite, service.publicurl=https://vikunja.example.com.
[*] service.publicurl is the only setting configured. cors.enable and cors.origins keep their defaults.
[+] The victim logs in and the refresh cookie is issued SameSite=None; Secure, so it is sent cross-site.
[+] A page on http://localhost:31337 is allowed to send credentials: Access-Control-Allow-Origin: http://localhost:31337, Access-Control-Allow-Credentials: true
[+] That page reads the response of a credentialed refresh, which carries a bearer token: eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6...
[+] The token authenticates as: 'victim'
EXPLOIT SUCCESSFUL
The fix is for service.publicurl to replace the localhost defaults rather than extend them, so that configuring a deployment narrows the allowed origins instead of widening them. If the localhost entries are retained deliberately for desktop clients, they should not be combined with AllowCredentials: true, since it is the combination that allows a third-party origin to read authenticated responses.
This vulnerability was found using Google's security automation tooling, abd triaged manually with manual report writing by Ada Logics. Please credit Google and Ada Logics in any advisories.
code.vikunja.io/api >= 2.2.0, <= 2.6.0Refer to the advisory for the patched release.
Connected by shared product, vendor, weakness, or advisory.
GHSA-9jrx-vmh8-c6xwHigh· 8.1Duplicate Advisory: Vikunja: Link-share principal ID collision allows cross-account API token issuance and management
CVE-2026-57458High· 8.1Vikunja: Scoped API token can mint unrestricted OAuth session credentials
GHSA-p4r4-8cxw-pjx7Critical· 6.5Duplicate Advisory: Vikunja: Link-share token reads any tenant's kanban buckets and enumerates usernames/IDs instance-wide (BOLA)
CVE-2026-62367HighVikunja: OIDC email-fallback account linking ignores email_verified, enabling local-account takeover
GHSA-9xwc-vwww-qqmwHigh· 7.5Duplicate Advisory: Vikunja: Link-share principal-type confusion enables cross-account team removal, bot takeover, and roster disclosure
CVE-2026-62376High· 8.1Vikunja: Plaintext storage of password-reset/email-confirm tokens in database enables account takeover on DB read access