GHSA-jhjp-4c2q-xmx4Medium· 4.3▾ Sunlitk8saudit shipped rules do not detect privileged/sensitive settings on init or ephemeral containers
▾ Sunlit zone — Low / medium · no exploitation signal
impact 23.7 · likelihood 0 · exploitation 0
Need a working PoC? Pro members can cast a request and our team develops one — it lands right here.
The k8saudit plugin's per-container fields (ka.req.pod.containers.*) and the shipped k8s_audit_rules.yaml evaluated only requestObject.spec.containers. Security-relevant settings on a pod's initContainers or ephemeralContainers were not inspected, so the shipped Create Privileged Pod rule did not fire for a privileged container placed in either list.
An actor able to create pods (the activity k8saudit is intended to audit) could run a privileged container without triggering the default Create Privileged Pod rule, by declaring it as an initContainer or ephemeralContainer instead of a regular container. Kubernetes runs such containers with the requested privileges, but the shipped rule did not see them. The same gap applied to other per-container security settings (capabilities, allowPrivilegeEscalation, runAsUser, etc.) and, for deployments using a customized image allowlist, to disallowed images placed in those lists.
This is a detection bypass of the default k8saudit ruleset, not a direct privilege escalation, and it requires the ability to create pods. The cloud-provider variants (k8saudit-eks, k8saudit-gke, k8saudit-aks, k8saudit-ovh) embed the same extraction logic and ship the same ruleset, and were affected equally.
Note: adding an ephemeral container goes through the pods/ephemeralcontainers subresource, so the EphemeralContainers Created rule still logged that event at NOTICE, but without any privileged/security evaluation.
Fixed in k8saudit 0.18.0, and in the cloud-variant releases that depend on it — k8saudit-eks 0.12.0, k8saudit-gke 0.9.0, k8saudit-aks 0.6.0, k8saudit-ovh 0.6.0 — all released on 2026-06-19.
The fix (falcosecurity/plugins#1400, merged 2026-06-18) adds dedicated ka.req.pod.initContainers.* and ka.req.pod.ephemeralContainers.* field families and updates Create Privileged Pod (via a new any_container_privileged macro) to evaluate all three container lists.
Operators upgrading should review any custom rules built on ka.req.pod.containers.* — in particular tuned Create Disallowed Pod image allowlists — and extend them to the new initContainers/ephemeralContainers image fields.
For deployments that cannot upgrade immediately, restrict who can create pods (RBAC) and enforce Pod Security Admission (baseline/restricted) or an admission controller (Kyverno, OPA/Gatekeeper) to block privileged init/ephemeral containers at admission time, as defense-in-depth.
kanywst — discovery and fix.
github.com/falcosecurity/plugins/plugins/k8saudit < 0.18.0github.com/falcosecurity/plugins/plugins/k8saudit-eks < 0.12.0github.com/falcosecurity/plugins/plugins/k8saudit-gke < 0.9.0github.com/falcosecurity/plugins/plugins/k8saudit-aks < 0.6.0github.com/falcosecurity/plugins/plugins/k8saudit-ovh < 0.6.0Upgrade to a patched release:
github.com/falcosecurity/plugins/plugins/k8saudit 0.18.0github.com/falcosecurity/plugins/plugins/k8saudit-eks 0.12.0github.com/falcosecurity/plugins/plugins/k8saudit-gke 0.9.0github.com/falcosecurity/plugins/plugins/k8saudit-aks 0.6.0github.com/falcosecurity/plugins/plugins/k8saudit-ovh 0.6.0Connected by shared product, vendor, weakness, or advisory.
CVE-2026-39452High· 7.3Protection mechanism failure for some Intel(R) Transfer Learning Tool before version v0.7 within Ring 3: User Applications may allow an escalation of privilege
CVE-2019-1970Medium· 5.8A vulnerability in the Secure Sockets Layer (SSL)/Transport Layer Security (TLS) protocol inspection engine of Cisco Firepower Threat Defense (FTD) Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass the configured file po…
CVE-2019-1669High· 8.6A vulnerability in the data acquisition (DAQ) component of Cisco Firepower Threat Defense (FTD) Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass configured access control policies or cause a denial of service (DoS) cond…
CVE-2018-0297Medium· 5.8A vulnerability in the detection engine of Cisco Firepower Threat Defense software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass a configured Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) Access Control (AC) policy to block SSL traffic
CVE-2018-0254Medium· 5.3A vulnerability in the detection engine of Cisco Firepower System Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass configured file action policies if an Intelligent Application Bypass (IAB) with a drop percentage thresh…
CVE-2018-0244Medium· 5.8A vulnerability in the detection engine of Cisco Firepower System Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass a configured file action policy to drop the Server Message Block (SMB) protocol if a malware file is det…