GHSA-4mpj-78p6-rj59Critical· 9.8▾ MidnightDuplicate Advisory: PickleScan's profile.run blocklist mismatch allows exec() bypass
▾ Midnight zone — Critical, or high with PoC / in-the-wild
impact 53.9 · likelihood 0 · exploitation 0
Need a working PoC? Pro members can cast a request and our team develops one — it lands right here.
Disclosure to exploitation, from the record and what we observed since indexing it.
Disclosed via GHSA
Last analysed / modified upstream
This advisory has been withdrawn because it is a duplicate of GHSA-7wx9-6375-f5wh. This link is maintained to preserve external references.
picklescan before 1.0.4 contains an incomplete blocklist for the profile module that fails to block the module-level profile.run() function, allowing attackers to achieve arbitrary code execution via exec(). Attackers can craft malicious pickle files calling profile.run(statement) to execute arbitrary Python code while picklescan reports zero security issues.
picklescan < 1.0.4Refer to the advisory for the patched release.
Connected by shared product, vendor, weakness, or advisory.
GHSA-g7vj-qw6x-g3p8Critical· 9.8Duplicate Advisory: PickleScan has multiple stdlib modules with direct RCE not in blocklist
GHSA-fh2f-24rh-r2vqHighDuplicate Advisory: Picklescan missing detection when calling built-in python library function timeit.timeit()
CVE-2025-71351MediumPicklescan missing detection when calling built-in python library function timeit.timeit()
CVE-2026-56315Critical· 9.8PickleScan has multiple stdlib modules with direct RCE not in blocklist
GHSA-6v84-v468-3c7fCritical· 9.8Duplicate Advisory: Picklescan has Incomplete List of Disallowed Inputs
GHSA-7f79-rvx6-vxc4Critical· 9.8Duplicate Advisory: Picklescan does not block ctypes