CVE-2026-72794High· 8.6▾ TwilightSiYuan: The session-cookie signing key (Conf.CookieKey) is returned to anonymous readers by /api/system/getConf
▾ Twilight zone — High severity, or a signal on a lesser flaw
impact 47.3 · likelihood 0 · exploitation 0
Need a working PoC? Pro members can cast a request and our team develops one — it lands right here.
Exploit-prediction probability, daily snapshots since Sep 4.
Disclosure to exploitation, from the record and what we observed since indexing it.
Disclosed via OSV
0.2%
Last analysed / modified upstream
CVE: This vulnerability corresponds to CVE-2026-72794.
/api/system/getConf returns Conf.CookieKey, the key used to sign the server's session cookies in its response body. The endpoint is registered with CheckAuth only, so the field reaches the publish RoleReader token and the anonymous account when Publish.Auth.Enable is false.
The configuration-export endpoint in the same file strips this exact field before returning config, so the project already treats it as secret. The reader-facing masking path does not.
| Item | Detail |
|---|---|
| Route | kernel/api/router.go:70 POST /api/system/getConf → model.CheckAuth → getConf |
| Middleware | CheckAuth only — no CheckReadonly, no CheckAdminRole |
| Leaked field | AppConf.CookieKey, serialized as cookieKey |
| Purpose of the field | Signing key for the siyuan session cookie |
The field survives every stage of the masking chain. getConf masks through GetMaskedConf() → HideConfSecret() (non-administrators) → FilterConfByPublishIgnore() (readers) → the browser-side System-path strip. CookieKey is removed by none of them:
GetMaskedConf masks UserData, MCPOAuth and AccessAuthCode only.HideConfSecret nulls AI, Api, Flashcard, ServerAddrs, Publish, Repo, Sync, Secrets, Variables and the System paths. It contains no reference to CookieKey.FilterConfByPublishIgnore touches UILayout only.The key is live, not vestigial. It is passed straight into the session store at startup:
cli/cmd/serve.go:67 go server.Serve(false, model.Conf.CookieKey)
kernel/server/serve.go:152 sessionStore = cookie.NewStore([]byte(cookieKey))
kernel/server/serve.go:159 ginServer.Use(sessions.Sessions("siyuan", sessionStore))
gin-contrib/sessions/cookie.NewStore constructed with a single key uses that key as the gorilla/securecookie HMAC key. The siyuan session cookie is therefore signed with the value the endpoint hands out. An attacker holding it can mint and modify session cookies that the server accepts as authentic.
Guarded sibling, in the same file. exportConf (kernel/api/system.go:299) clones the configuration before returning it and explicitly clears both secrets:
kernel/api/system.go:360 clonedConf.CookieKey = ""
clonedConf.NotebookCrypto = nil
The project has already classified CookieKey as a value that must not leave the server. The getConf masking path omits the same field.
Ceiling is environment-dependent, floor is not. Escalating a forged session to administrator additionally requires the forged SessionData to carry the matching AccessAuthCode, which GetMaskedConf does mask or the instance to have no access-auth code configured, which is a common deployment. The unconditional impact, present on every instance, is the disclosure of a persistent cryptographic secret to an unauthenticated party together with the cookie-forgery capability that follows from it. Rotating the key invalidates all existing sessions, so this is not a secret that can be quietly refreshed.
Precondition: publish mode enabled (default port 6808); anonymous when Publish.Auth.Enable is false, otherwise any publish reader account.
POST http://127.0.0.1:6808/api/system/getConf
{}
→ 200
The response body's conf object contains a cookieKey field holding the
server's session-signing key in cleartext.
Differential check against the endpoint that does strip it:
POST http://127.0.0.1:6808/api/system/exportConf
→ cookieKey is empty, notebookCrypto is null
The same value is withheld by one endpoint and returned by the other.
An anonymous reader in publish mode or any publish RoleReader obtains the server's session-cookie signing key. This is a persistent cryptographic secret whose disclosure cannot be remediated without invalidating every active session. Possession of the key permits forging and tampering with siyuan session cookies that the server will validate as authentic. On instances with no access-auth code configured, or where a forged session's contents otherwise satisfy the server's checks, this extends to authenticating as a privileged user.
Clear CookieKey in HideConfSecret for all non-administrator responses. The more durable fix is to route non-administrator getConf through the exportConf cloner, which already handles CookieKey, NotebookCrypto, Account, Stat, System.ID, Export.PandocBin and the AI keys replacing the current blocklist, which fails open on every field nobody thought to add, with the allowlist-style cloner the project already maintains.
github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel < 0.0.0-20260725123945-77421530be4aUpgrade to a patched release:
github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel 0.0.0-20260725123945-77421530be4aConnected by shared product, vendor, weakness, or advisory.
GHSA-57v5-wqx3-cgj4Medium· 5.8SiYuan: Database view structure (all view names, layout types and per-field visibility) is returned to anonymous readers by /api/av/getAt…
CVE-2026-72790Medium· 5.8SiYuan: Notebook name, document count, size and timestamps are returned for any notebook, including notebooks hidden from readers, by /ap…
CVE-2026-72799Medium· 5.8SiYuan: Missing publish-access filter on the HPath/path-resolution endpoints discloses the private document tree to anonymous readers
CVE-2026-68584High· 8.6SiYuan: Anonymous publish-password authentication bypass via getHeadingChildrenDOM / getHeading*Transaction / getBacklinkDoc (publish mode)
CVE-2026-72806Medium· 5.8SiYuan: Password (protected) tier omitted in the attribute-view/database publish filter: Reader receives rows of protected documents with…
CVE-2026-72800Medium· 5.8SiYuan: Missing publish-access filter on getAttributeViewKeysByID discloses database column schema, plus two unscoped block-ID enumeratio…