CVE-2026-66874Medium· 6.5▾ SunlitFor pull request events, Gitea reads workflow definitions from the pull request head and posts a synthetic skipped status when workflow branch or path filters exclude execution. A fork pull request author can supply a workflow matching a…
▾ Sunlit zone — Low / medium · no exploitation signal
impact 35.8 · likelihood 0 · exploitation 0
Need a working PoC? Pro members can cast a request and our team develops one — it lands right here.
Disclosure to exploitation, from the record and what we observed since indexing it.
Disclosed via NVD
— → 6.5
none → medium
For pull request events, Gitea reads workflow definitions from the pull request head and posts a synthetic skipped status when workflow branch or path filters exclude execution. A fork pull request author can supply a workflow matching a required status context but deliberately prevent it from running. Because skipped statuses count as success, branch protection or organization-required workflow checks can appear satisfied without the mandated workflow executing; no runner or maintainer approval is required for this path.
Refer to the linked advisories for vendor-supplied fixes and affected version ranges.
Field changes observed since this record was first indexed.
Connected by shared product, vendor, weakness, or advisory.
CVE-2025-14095Medium· 6.8A "Privilege boundary violation" vulnerability is identified affecting multiple Radiometer Products
CVE-2014-7810Medium· 5.0The Expression Language (EL) implementation in Apache Tomcat 6.x before 6.0.44, 7.x before 7.0.58, and 8.x before 8.0.16 does not properly consider the possibility of an accessible interface implemented by an inaccessible class, which al…
CVE-2025-0040NoneImproper access control between the Joint Test Action Group (JTAG) and Advanced Extensible Interface (AXI) could allow an attacker with physical access to read or overwrite the contents of cross-chip debug (XCD) registers potentially res…
CVE-2025-43524High· 8.8An access issue was addressed with additional sandbox restrictions
CVE-2025-55895Critical· 9.1TOTOLINK A3300R V17.0.0cu.557_B20221024 and N200RE V9.3.5u.6448_B20240521 and V9.3.5u.6437_B20230519 are vulnerable to Incorrect Access Control
CVE-2019-13565High· 7.5An issue was discovered in OpenLDAP 2.x before 2.4.48