CVE-2026-11545Low· 3.7▾ SunlitIBM WebSphere Application Server 8.5 and 9.0 could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information from the administrative console due to missing authorization checks.
▾ Sunlit zone — Low / medium · no exploitation signal
impact 20.4 · likelihood 0.1 · exploitation 0
Need a working PoC? Pro members can cast a request and our team develops one — it lands right here.
Stakeholder-Specific Vulnerability Categorization from CISA's ADP record at CVE.org: whether exploitation is observed, whether an attack can be automated, and how much of the system is at stake.
Exploit-prediction probability, daily snapshots since Sep 19.
Disclosure to exploitation, from the record and what we observed since indexing it.
Disclosed via NVD
Last analysed / modified upstream
0.3%
IBM WebSphere Application Server 8.5 and 9.0 could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information from the administrative console due to missing authorization checks.
Refer to the linked advisories for vendor-supplied fixes and affected version ranges.
Connected by shared product, vendor, weakness, or advisory.
CVE-2026-16190Low· 3.1IBM WebSphere Application Server 9.0, and 8.5 is affected by an authorization bypass vulnerability.
CVE-2026-16187Medium· 6.5IBM WebSphere Application Server 9.0, and 8.5 could allow a remote attacker to bypass authentication and obtain sensitive information by sending a crafted unauthenticated request.
CVE-2026-16185Medium· 6.4IBM WebSphere Application Server 9.0, and 8.5 could allow a remote attacker to bypass authentication on an admin console servlet.
CVE-2026-11539Medium· 5.3IBM WebSphere Application Server 9.0 and 8.5 is affected by an authentication bypass vulnerability in the SOAP/JMX connector.
CVE-2026-11540Medium· 5.3IBM WebSphere Application Server 9.0 and 8.5 could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information about the file system through the FileTransfer servlet.
CVE-2026-11710Medium· 6.5IBM WebSphere Application Server 8.5 is affected by an HTTP request smuggling vulnerability due to improper handling of Content-Length headers.