CVE-2025-64181High· 7.5▾ TwilightOpenEXR Makes Use of Uninitialized Memory
▾ Twilight zone — High severity, or a signal on a lesser flaw
impact 41.3 · likelihood 0.1 · exploitation 0
Need a working PoC? Pro members can cast a request and our team develops one — it lands right here.
Exploit-prediction probability, daily snapshots since Jul 13.
Disclosure to exploitation, from the record and what we observed since indexing it.
Disclosed via OSV
Last analysed / modified upstream
0.4%
0.4% → 0.4%
While fuzzing openexr_exrcheck_fuzzer, Valgrind reports a conditional branch depending on uninitialized data inside generic_unpack. This indicates a use of uninitialized memory (CWE-457). The issue is reproducible with the current OSS-Fuzz harness and a single-file PoC.
Environment:
valgrind --tool=memcheck --track-origins=yesopenexr_exrcheck_fuzzer openexr 3.4.2 | commit fd657e8a41e157e5841c7cc2e2a5efe094b069a1 (grafted, HEAD -> main, origin/main, origin/HEAD)Function: generic_unpack
Possible root cause (based on observed symptoms): The unpacker is branching on bytes in a scratch buffer that were never written because the decode step didn’t fully populate it.
generic_unpack(). That function reads from the decompressed/expanded pixel buffer to scatter data into the framebuffer. A “conditional jump depends on uninitialised value(s)” means it’s consulting bytes in that buffer before they were written.exr_decoding_run().Valgrind Trace (top frames):
==454== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
==454== at 0x4539BE: generic_unpack (in /out/openexr_exrcheck_fuzzer)
==454== by 0x44B85F: exr_decoding_run (in /out/openexr_exrcheck_fuzzer)
==454== by 0x38BC5F: Imf_4_0::(anonymous namespace)::TileProcess::run_decode(_priv_exr_context_t const*, int, Imf_4_0::FrameBuffer const*, std::__1::vector<Imf_4_0::Slice, std::__1::allocator<Imf_4_0::Slice> > const&) (in /out/openexr_exrcheck_fuzzer)
==454== by 0x388BE1: Imf_4_0::TiledInputFile::Data::readTiles(int, int, int, int, int, int) (in /out/openexr_exrcheck_fuzzer)
==454== by 0x388619: Imf_4_0::TiledInputFile::readTiles(int, int, int, int, int, int) (in /out/openexr_exrcheck_fuzzer)
==454== by 0x353755: Imf_4_0::InputFile::Data::bufferedReadPixels(int, int) (in /out/openexr_exrcheck_fuzzer)
==454== by 0x352286: Imf_4_0::InputFile::readPixels(int) (in /out/openexr_exrcheck_fuzzer)
==454== by 0x3190FA: Imf_4_0::(anonymous namespace)::readMultiPart(Imf_4_0::MultiPartInputFile&, bool, bool) (in /out/openexr_exrcheck_fuzzer)
==454== by 0x314C4D: Imf_4_0::checkOpenEXRFile(char const*, unsigned long, bool, bool, bool) (in /out/openexr_exrcheck_fuzzer)
==454== Uninitialised value was created by a heap allocation at 0x483B7F3: malloc (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
In the attached archive, you will find:
To observe the bug, simply run the OSS-Fuzz helper script:
git clone https://github.com/google/oss-fuzz.git
cd oss-fuzz
python3 infra/helper.py build_image openexr
python3 infra/helper.py build_fuzzers --sanitizer=none openexr
python3 infra/helper.py shell openexr
apt update && apt install -y valgrind
ulimit -n 65535
valgrind --tool=memcheck --track-origins=yes /out/openexr_exrcheck_fuzzer /path/to/poc
Credit: Aldo Ristori archive0.zip
Other saved testcases from the fuzzing campaign trigger the same underlying bug, but with a different manifestation. So there is one root cause (missing post-decode validation / zero-init before any unpack), with different call-sites. Below there are several archives, formatted like the previous one, that reproduce the other test cases.
Other observed sinks (distinct manifestations of the same bug):
Deep pointers path: generic_unpack_deep_pointers (deep scanline/tiled) archive1.zip
Deep sample table path: unpack_sample_table (deep scanline) archive2.zip
Half conversion path: half_to_float_buffer_f16c via unpack_half_to_float_3chan_planar archive3.zip
Deep compositing: CompositeDeepScanLine::readPixels → ThreadPool::addTask → LineCompositeTask::execute archive4.zip
openexr >= 3.3.0, < 3.3.6openexr >= 3.4.0, < 3.4.3Upgrade to a patched release:
openexr 3.3.6openexr 3.4.3Connected by shared product, vendor, weakness, or advisory.
CVE-2025-64182High· 7.8OpenEXR has buffer overflow in PyOpenEXR_old's channels() and channel()
CVE-2026-34543HighOpenEXR: Heap information disclosure in PXR24 decompression via unchecked decompressed size (undo_pxr24_impl)
CVE-2026-26981Medium· 6.5OpenEXR has heap-buffer-overflow via signed integer underflow in ImfContextInit.cpp
CVE-2026-34589Medium· 5.0OpenEXR: DWA Lossy Decoder Heap Out-of-Bounds Write
CVE-2026-34544HighOpenEXR: integer overflow to OOB write in uncompress_b44_impl()
CVE-2026-27622High· 8.4OpenEXR CompositeDeepScanLine integer-overflow leads to heap OOB write