CVE-2025-47774Low▾ SunlitVyper's `slice()` may elide side-effects when output length is 0
▾ Sunlit zone — Low / medium · no exploitation signal
impact 13.8 · likelihood 0.1 · exploitation 0
Need a working PoC? Pro members can cast a request and our team develops one — it lands right here.
Exploit-prediction probability, daily snapshots since Jul 8.
Disclosure to exploitation, from the record and what we observed since indexing it.
Disclosed via OSV
Last analysed / modified upstream
0.4%
0.4% → 0.5%
the slice() builtin can elide side effects when the output length is 0, and the source bytestring is a builtin (msg.data or <address>.code). the reason is that for these source locations, the check that length >= 1 is skipped:
https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/blob/68b68c4b30c5ef2f312b4674676170b8a6eaa316/vyper/builtins/functions.py#L315-L319
the result is that a 0-length bytestring constructed with slice can be passed to make_byte_array_copier, which elides evaluation of its source argument when the max length is 0:
https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/blob/68b68c4b30c5ef2f312b4674676170b8a6eaa316/vyper/codegen/core.py#L189-L191
the impact is that side effects in the start argument may be elided when the length argument is 0, e.g. slice(msg.data, self.do_side_effect(), 0).
the following example illustrates how the issue would look in user code
counter: public(uint256)
@external
def test() -> Bytes[10]:
b: Bytes[10] = slice(msg.data, self.side_effect(), 0)
return b
def side_effect() -> uint256:
self.counter += 1
return 0
the severity assigned is low, since this is not a very useful pattern and unlikely to be found in user code.
the fix is tracked in https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/pull/4645, which disallows any invocation of slice() with length 0, including for the ad hoc locations discussed in this advisory.
Is there a way for users to fix or remediate the vulnerability without upgrading?
Are there any links users can visit to find out more?
vyper <= 0.4.2rc1Refer to the advisory for the patched release.
Connected by shared product, vendor, weakness, or advisory.
CVE-2024-24567Medium· 4.8Vyper's raw_call `value=` kwargs not disabled for static and delegate calls
CVE-2023-30629High· 7.5Incorrect success value returned in vyper
CVE-2025-21607LowVyper Does Not Check the Success of Certain Precompile Calls
CVE-2023-32059High· 7.5Vyper vulnerable to incorrect ordering of arguments for kwargs passed to internal calls
CVE-2023-30837High· 7.5vyper vulnerable to storage allocator overflow
CVE-2024-24560Low· 3.7Vyper's external calls can overflow return data to return input buffer