CVE-2025-31958Low· 3.7▾ SunlitHCL BigFix Service Management is susceptible to HTTP Request Smuggling. HTTP request smuggling vulnerabilities arise when websites route HTTP requests through web servers with inconsistent HTTP parsing. HTTP Smuggling exploits inconsist…
▾ Sunlit zone — Low / medium · no exploitation signal
impact 20.4 · likelihood 0 · exploitation 0
Need a working PoC? Pro members can cast a request and our team develops one — it lands right here.
Disclosure to exploitation, from the record and what we observed since indexing it.
Disclosed via NVD
Last analysed / modified upstream
0.2%
HCL BigFix Service Management is susceptible to HTTP Request Smuggling. HTTP request smuggling vulnerabilities arise when websites route HTTP requests through web servers with inconsistent HTTP parsing. HTTP Smuggling exploits inconsistencies in request parsing between front-end and back-end servers, allowing attackers to bypass security controls and perform attacks like cache poisoning or request hijacking.
bigfix_service_management = 23.0Refer to the linked advisories for vendor-supplied fixes and affected version ranges.
Connected by shared product, vendor, weakness, or advisory.
CVE-2025-52613Medium· 4.6HCL BigFix Service Management (SM) is affected by use of a vulnerable WSGI Server was identified
CVE-2025-31960Medium· 5.3HCL BigFix Service Management (SM) is vulnerable to information exposure due to improper error handling within its reporting module
CVE-2025-31974Low· 3.9HCL BigFix Service Management (SM) is susceptible to a Root File System Not Mounted as Read-Only
CVE-2025-31982Low· 3.7HCL BigFix Service Management (SM) had directories that were not linked or publicly visible but could be accessed directly
CVE-2025-31983Low· 3.7HCL BigFix Service Management (SM) is affected by a security misconfiguration vulnerability due to CSP header
CVE-2025-31984Low· 3.7HCL BigFix Service Management (SM) is affected by a security misconfiguration due to a missing or insecure “X-Content-Type-Options” header