CVE-2024-21644High· 7.5▾ MidnightPoC availablepyload Unauthenticated Flask Configuration Leakage vulnerability
▾ Midnight zone — Critical, or high with PoC / in-the-wild
impact 41.3 · likelihood 8.5 · exploitation 12
A public proof-of-concept already exists for this vulnerability — see Exploit availability below.
Public exploit / PoC code seen in 2 sources. Availability, not in-the-wild use.
Exploit-prediction probability, daily snapshots since Jul 8.
Disclosure to exploitation, from the record and what we observed since indexing it.
Disclosed via OSV
42%
42% → 42%
1 GitHub repo · Nuclei ×1
Last analysed / modified upstream
Any unauthenticated user can browse to a specific URL to expose the Flask config, including the SECRET_KEY variable.
Any unauthenticated user can browse to a specific URL to expose the Flask config, including the SECRET_KEY variable.
Run pyload in the default configuration by running the following command
pyload
Now browse to http://localhost:8000/render/info.html. Notice how the Flask configuration gets displayed.

I was quite amused by this finding. I think it's a very interesting coming together of things that is so unlikely to happen. Below I will detail my process a bit more.
I was looking through the code to see how the authorization mechanism is implemented when I spotted this route, which can be accessed by any unauthenticated actor
@bp.route("/render/<path:filename>", endpoint="render")
def render(filename):
mimetype = mimetypes.guess_type(filename)[0] or "text/html"
data = render_template(filename)
return flask.Response(data, mimetype=mimetype)
This route allows me to load in any of the predefined templates. However, these templates will be lacking any form of context, and as such it doesn't seem too useful. That is until I loaded the info.html template and scrolled down, revealing the Flask config. This was purely accidental, and I did not understand why it happened, until I looked at the template
<tr>
<td>{{ _("Config folder:") }}</td>
<td>{{ config }}</td>
</tr>
In Flask, every template always gets the Flask config passed to it as the config variable. In the normal execution of this template, this value gets overwritten in the function below, but since we're calling it and bypassing this function altogether, it doesn't get overwritten. Would this variable not be named config and named configuration or Config instead, then this exploit wouldn't work. The likelihood of this occurring is so small, but it seems to have happened here.
context = {
"python": sys.version,
"os": " ".join((os.name, sys.platform) + extra),
"version": api.get_server_version(),
"folder": PKGDIR,
"config": api.get_userdir(),
"download": conf["general"]["storage_folder"]["value"],
"freespace": format.size(api.free_space()),
"webif": conf["webui"]["port"]["value"],
"language": conf["general"]["language"]["value"],
}
return render_template("info.html", **context)
Depending on the how the Flask config data is used, it could have detrimental consequences for the security. It's crucial to keep the SECRET_KEY secret and never expose it in your code or configuration files.
pyload-ng < 0.5.0b3.dev77Upgrade to a patched release:
pyload-ng 0.5.0b3.dev77Field changes observed since this record was first indexed.
Connected by shared product, vendor, weakness, or advisory.
CVE-2024-22416Critical· 9.6Cross-Site Request Forgery on any API call in pyLoad may lead to admin privilege escalation
CVE-2024-21645Medium· 5.3pyload Log Injection vulnerability
CVE-2025-54802Critical· 9.8pyLoad CNL Blueprint allows Path Traversal through `dlc_path` which leads to Remote Code Execution (RCE)
CVE-2026-45306Medium· 6.5pyLoad Has Incomplete Fix for CVE-2026-33509 -storage_folder Bypass via Session Directory in pyLoad
CVE-2026-35463High· 8.8pyLoad: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command
CVE-2026-40071Medium· 5.4pyload-ng has a WebUI JSON permission mismatch that lets ADD/DELETE users invoke MODIFY-only actions