CVE-2023-31146High· 7.5▾ TwilightVyper vulnerable to OOB DynArray access when array is on both LHS and RHS of an assignment
▾ Twilight zone — High severity, or a signal on a lesser flaw
impact 41.3 · likelihood 0.2 · exploitation 0
Need a working PoC? Pro members can cast a request and our team develops one — it lands right here.
Exploit-prediction probability, daily snapshots since Sep 12.
Disclosure to exploitation, from the record and what we observed since indexing it.
Disclosed via OSV
Last analysed / modified upstream
1.2%
during codegen, the length word of a dynarray is written before the data, which can result in OOB array access in the case where the dynarray is on both the lhs and rhs of an assignment. here is a minimal example producing the issue:
a:DynArray[uint256,3]
@external
def test() -> DynArray[uint256,3]:
self.a = [1,2,3]
self.a = empty(DynArray[uint256,3])
self.a = [self.a[0],self.a[1],self.a[2]]
return self.a # return [1,2,3]
and here is an example demonstrating the issue can cause data corruption across call frames:
@external
def test() -> DynArray[uint256,3]:
self.a()
return self.b() # return [1,2,3]
@internal
def a():
a: uint256 = 0
b: uint256 = 1
c: uint256 = 2
d: uint256 = 3
@internal
def b() -> DynArray[uint256,3]:
a: DynArray[uint256,3] = empty(DynArray[uint256,3])
a = [a[0],a[1],a[2]]
return a
examples involving append and pop:
@internal
def foo():
c: DynArray[uint256, 1] = []
c.append(c[0])
@internal
def foo():
c: DynArray[uint256, 1] = [1]
c[0] = c.pop()
the expected behavior in all of the above cases is to revert due to oob array access.
patched in 4f8289a81206f767df1900ac48f485d90fc87edb
Is there a way for users to fix or remediate the vulnerability without upgrading?
Are there any links users can visit to find out more?
vyper < 0.3.8Upgrade to a patched release:
vyper 0.3.8Connected by shared product, vendor, weakness, or advisory.
CVE-2024-24567Medium· 4.8Vyper's raw_call `value=` kwargs not disabled for static and delegate calls
CVE-2023-30629High· 7.5Incorrect success value returned in vyper
CVE-2025-21607LowVyper Does Not Check the Success of Certain Precompile Calls
CVE-2023-32059High· 7.5Vyper vulnerable to incorrect ordering of arguments for kwargs passed to internal calls
CVE-2023-30837High· 7.5vyper vulnerable to storage allocator overflow
CVE-2024-24560Low· 3.7Vyper's external calls can overflow return data to return input buffer