CVE-2023-27593Medium· 4.4▾ Sunlitcilium-agent container can access the host via `hostPath` mount
▾ Sunlit zone — Low / medium · no exploitation signal
impact 24.2 · likelihood 0 · exploitation 0
Need a working PoC? Pro members can cast a request and our team develops one — it lands right here.
Exploit-prediction probability, daily snapshots since Sep 12.
Disclosure to exploitation, from the record and what we observed since indexing it.
Disclosed via OSV
Last analysed / modified upstream
0.2%
An attacker with access to a Cilium agent pod can write to /opt/cni/bin due to a hostPath mount of that directory in the agent pod. By replacing the CNI binary with their own malicious binary and waiting for the creation of a new pod on the node, the attacker can gain access to the underlying node.
The issue has been fixed and is available on versions >=1.11.15, >=1.12.8, >=1.13.1.
Kubernetes RBAC should be used to deny users and service accounts exec access to Cilium agent pods.
In cases where a user requires exec access to Cilium agent pods, but should not have access to the underlying node, no workaround is possible.
The Cilium community has worked together with members of Isovalent and Form3 to prepare these mitigations. Special thanks to Anastasios Koutlis, Daniel Teixeira, and Magdalena Oczadly for their cooperation.
If you have any questions or comments about this advisory, please reach out on Slack.
As usual, if you think you found a related vulnerability, we strongly encourage you to report security vulnerabilities to our private security mailing list: [email protected] - first, before disclosing them in any public forums. This is a private mailing list where only members of the Cilium internal security team are subscribed to, and is treated as top priority.
github.com/cilium/cilium < 1.11.15github.com/cilium/cilium >= 1.12.0, < 1.12.8github.com/cilium/cilium >= 1.13.0, < 1.13.1Upgrade to a patched release:
github.com/cilium/cilium 1.11.15github.com/cilium/cilium 1.12.8github.com/cilium/cilium 1.13.1Connected by shared product, vendor, weakness, or advisory.
CVE-2024-25630Medium· 6.1Unencrypted ingress/health traffic when using Wireguard transparent encryption
CVE-2024-28248High· 7.2Intermittent HTTP policy bypass
CVE-2025-32793Medium· 4.0In Cilium, packets from terminating endpoints may not be encrypted in Wireguard-enabled clusters
CVE-2023-41333Medium· 6.9Cilium vulnerable to bypass of namespace restrictions in CiliumNetworkPolicy
CVE-2024-47825Medium· 4.0Cilium's CIDR deny policies may not take effect when a more narrow CIDR allow is present
CVE-2025-64715Medium· 4.0Cilium with misconfigured toGroups in policies can lead to unrestricted egress traffic