{"id":"CVE-2026-93132","title":"In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nACPI: RISC-V: Fix riscv_acpi_add_prt_dep() loop handling\n\nThe loop in riscv_acpi_add_prt_dep() includes error conditions that are\nhandled in a dubious - if not outright…","summary":"In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nACPI: RISC-V: Fix riscv_acpi_add_prt_dep() loop handling\n\nThe loop in riscv_acpi_add_prt_dep() includes error conditions that are\nhandled in a dubious - if not outright…","severity":"none","vendor":"Linux","product":"Linux","affected":["Linux >= 1b173cc4bfcdcf4a49927952ba3a445c5b293723 < 41652ca8c6ff2b77b9780cbbb2f20f1551b9ff80","Linux >= 1b173cc4bfcdcf4a49927952ba3a445c5b293723 < c9729ced165d6c5b57d99141b6632bb8711efec9","Linux >= 1b173cc4bfcdcf4a49927952ba3a445c5b293723 < 3fd86a5d6facb6618f63a76d499f28007cef878f","Linux >= 1b173cc4bfcdcf4a49927952ba3a445c5b293723 < 3a56321d0aceee2a0bd80d23366401c131ff8350","Linux 6.12"],"published":"2026-09-17","updated":"2026-09-17","sourceUpdated":"2026-09-17T17:18:08.047","source":"NVD","sourceUrl":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-93132","references":[{"url":"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3a56321d0aceee2a0bd80d23366401c131ff8350","label":"416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67"},{"url":"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3fd86a5d6facb6618f63a76d499f28007cef878f","label":"416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67"},{"url":"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/41652ca8c6ff2b77b9780cbbb2f20f1551b9ff80","label":"416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67"},{"url":"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c9729ced165d6c5b57d99141b6632bb8711efec9","label":"416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67"}],"tags":["nvd","cve.org"],"ingestedAt":"2026-09-17T16:21:47.747Z","epss":0.002,"epssPercentile":0.10167,"slug":"CVE-2026-93132","body":"## Overview\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nACPI: RISC-V: Fix riscv_acpi_add_prt_dep() loop handling\n\nThe loop in riscv_acpi_add_prt_dep() includes error conditions that are\nhandled in a dubious - if not outright wrong - way, by continuining the\nloop (which skips and misses the entry pointer update to point to the next\nentry).\n\nRewrite the loop as a for loop (that handles the continuation correctly)\nand wrap the condition and update statements using helper functions to make\nit cleaner.\n\n## Remediation\n\nRefer to the linked advisories for vendor-supplied fixes and affected version ranges.","depth":"sunlit","depthScore":3,"depthScoreParts":{"impact":2.8,"likelihood":0,"exploitation":0,"ransomware":0},"changes":[]}