{"id":"CVE-2026-58203","aliases":["GHSA-4xgf-cpjx-pc3j"],"title":"pydantic-settings: NestedSecretsSettingsSource follows symlinks outside secrets_dir, enabling local file read and bypassing secrets_dir_m…","summary":"pydantic-settings: NestedSecretsSettingsSource follows symlinks outside secrets_dir, enabling local file read and bypassing secrets_dir_max_size","severity":"medium","cvss":5.3,"cvssVector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L","vendor":"pydantic-settings","product":"pydantic-settings","ecosystem":"pip","affected":["pydantic-settings >= 2.12.0, < 2.14.2"],"patched":["pydantic-settings 2.14.2"],"published":"2026-06-19","updated":"2026-09-10","sourceUpdated":"2026-09-10T03:50:48.282428168Z","source":"OSV","sourceUrl":"https://osv.dev/vulnerability/GHSA-4xgf-cpjx-pc3j","references":[{"url":"https://github.com/pydantic/pydantic-settings/security/advisories/GHSA-4xgf-cpjx-pc3j"},{"url":"https://github.com/pydantic/pydantic-settings"}],"tags":["osv","pip"],"epss":0.00185,"epssPercentile":0.08303,"ingestedAt":"2026-07-08T18:25:45.731Z","slug":"CVE-2026-58203","body":"## Overview\n\n### Summary\n\n`NestedSecretsSettingsSource` reads secret values from files in a configured `secrets_dir`. When `secrets_nested_subdir=True`, a directory entry inside `secrets_dir` that is a symbolic link pointing **outside** `secrets_dir` is followed, so files outside the configured directory are read into settings values. The same code path bypasses the documented `secrets_dir_max_size` protection. An attacker or lower-privileged component able to influence entries in the configured secrets directory (for example, a writable or shared secrets mount) can turn this into an unintended local file read into settings and can defeat the advertised loading-size cap. This report does not claim network reachability by itself.\n\n### Details\n\n`NestedSecretsSettingsSource` performed two passes over `secrets_dir` using two different, inconsistent directory-traversal implementations:\n\n* The size check in `validate_secrets_path()` used `Path.glob('**/*')`, which does **not** descend into a symbolically-linked directory.\n* The loader in `load_secrets()` used `glob.iglob(f'{path}/**/*', recursive=True)` followed by `read_text()`, which **does** follow symlinked directories and reads through the link target.\n\nBecause the two passes disagreed on symlinks, a symlinked directory inside `secrets_dir` whose target lives elsewhere was invisible to the size accounting (counted as 0 bytes) while still being fully read by the loader. This produces two distinct problems:\n\n1. **Out-of-tree read (CWE-22 / CWE-59).** A symlinked directory (or file) inside `secrets_dir` that resolves outside it is followed, and the external file's contents are loaded into the corresponding settings field.\n2. **`secrets_dir_max_size` bypass (CWE-400).** The size check never sees the out-of-tree content, so the documented size cap is neither respected nor able to reject the oversized external file. A related amplification exists for cyclic in-tree symlinks, which `glob.iglob(recursive=True)` re-traverses, inflating the size accounting and the number of loaded secrets.\n\n#### Reproduction\n\nIn a clean Linux container, with a `secrets_dir` containing a symlink `secrets/db -> /path/outside` and an `outside/passwd` file of 512 bytes, while `secrets_dir_max_size=100`:\n\n```python\nfrom pydantic import BaseModel\nfrom pydantic_settings import (\n    BaseSettings,\n    SettingsConfigDict,\n    NestedSecretsSettingsSource,\n)\n\n\nclass Db(BaseModel):\n    passwd: str | None = None\n\n\nclass Settings(BaseSettings):\n    model_config = SettingsConfigDict(\n        secrets_dir='secrets',\n        secrets_nested_subdir=True,\n        secrets_dir_max_size=100,  # outside/passwd is 512 bytes\n    )\n    db: Db = Db()\n\n    @classmethod\n    def settings_customise_sources(\n        cls, settings_cls, init_settings, env_settings, dotenv_settings, file_secret_settings\n    ):\n        return (NestedSecretsSettingsSource(file_secret_settings),)\n```\n\nOn affected versions, `Settings().db.passwd` is populated with the 512-byte out-of-tree file and **no** `SettingsError` is raised, even though the file exceeds `secrets_dir_max_size`.\n\n### Impact\n\nApplications that opt into `NestedSecretsSettingsSource` with `secrets_nested_subdir=True` and load secrets from a directory whose entries can be influenced by an attacker or a lower-privileged component (for example, a writable or shared secrets mount, or a secrets directory partially populated from untrusted input) are affected. The impact is:\n\n* **Confidentiality:** files outside the configured `secrets_dir` can be read into settings values (local file read).\n* **Integrity / availability of the safeguard:** the advertised `secrets_dir_max_size` cap can be bypassed, and cyclic symlinks can inflate resource usage during loading.\n\nThe vulnerability requires the ability to place a symbolic link inside the configured secrets directory; it is not remotely reachable on its own. Applications that do not use `NestedSecretsSettingsSource`, or that point `secrets_dir` at a directory fully under the application's control, are not affected.\n\n### Mitigation\n\nUpgrade to **pydantic-settings 2.14.2**, which:\n\n* walks the secrets directory explicitly and only descends into directories whose resolved path stays within `secrets_dir`, so symlinked directories pointing outside are never followed;\n* uses a single, cycle-safe iterator for both the size check and the loader, so the size accounting and the loaded set are always consistent and each real directory is visited at most once;\n* skips any file whose resolved path escapes `secrets_dir`, as defense in depth.\n\nIf upgrading is not immediately possible, ensure the configured `secrets_dir` is fully owned and controlled by the application (no writable or attacker-influenced entries), or avoid `secrets_nested_subdir=True`.\n\n## Affected packages\n\n- `pydantic-settings >= 2.12.0, < 2.14.2`\n\n## Remediation\n\nUpgrade to a patched release:\n\n- `pydantic-settings 2.14.2`","depth":"sunlit","depthScore":29,"depthScoreParts":{"impact":29.2,"likelihood":0,"exploitation":0,"ransomware":0},"changes":[]}