{"id":"CVE-2025-37964","title":"x86/mm: Eliminate window where TLB flushes may be inadvertently skipped","summary":"In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nx86/mm: Eliminate window where TLB flushes may be inadvertently skipped\n\ntl;dr: There is a window in the mm switching code where the new CR3 is\nset and the CPU should b…","severity":"high","cvss":7.8,"cvssVector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H","cvssSource":"cna","vendor":"Linux","product":"Linux","affected":["Linux >= 848b5815177582de0e1d0118725378e0fbadca20 < 12f703811af043d32b1c8a30001b2fa04d5cd0ac","Linux >= b47002ed65ade940839b7f439ff4a194e7d5ec28 < 02ad4ce144bd27f71f583f667fdf3b3ba0753477","Linux >= a04fe3bfc71e28009e20357b79df1e8ef7c9d600 < d41072906abec8bb8e01ed16afefbaa558908c89","Linux >= 3dbe889a1b829b4c07e0836ff853fe649e51ce4f < d87392094f96e162fa5fa5a8640d70cc0952806f","Linux >= 6db2526c1d694c91c6e05e2f186c085e9460f202 < 399ec9ca8fc4999e676ff89a90184ec40031cf59","Linux >= 6db2526c1d694c91c6e05e2f186c085e9460f202 < fea4e317f9e7e1f449ce90dedc27a2d2a95bee5a","Linux d1347977661342cb09a304a17701eb2d4aa21dec","Linux >= 5.15.179 < 5.15.183","Linux >= 6.1.129 < 6.1.139","Linux >= 6.6.79 < 6.6.91","Linux >= 6.12.16 < 6.12.29","Linux >= 6.13.4 < 6.14","Linux 6.14"],"published":"2025-05-20","updated":"2026-09-08","sourceUpdated":"2026-09-08T08:41:38.792Z","source":"CVEORG","sourceUrl":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37964","references":[{"url":"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/12f703811af043d32b1c8a30001b2fa04d5cd0ac"},{"url":"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/02ad4ce144bd27f71f583f667fdf3b3ba0753477"},{"url":"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d41072906abec8bb8e01ed16afefbaa558908c89"},{"url":"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d87392094f96e162fa5fa5a8640d70cc0952806f"},{"url":"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/399ec9ca8fc4999e676ff89a90184ec40031cf59"},{"url":"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/fea4e317f9e7e1f449ce90dedc27a2d2a95bee5a"}],"tags":["cve.org"],"epss":0.00191,"epssPercentile":0.09022,"ingestedAt":"2026-09-08T15:33:26.997Z","slug":"CVE-2025-37964","body":"## Overview\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nx86/mm: Eliminate window where TLB flushes may be inadvertently skipped\n\ntl;dr: There is a window in the mm switching code where the new CR3 is\nset and the CPU should be getting TLB flushes for the new mm.  But\nshould_flush_tlb() has a bug and suppresses the flush.  Fix it by\nwidening the window where should_flush_tlb() sends an IPI.\n\nLong Version:\n\n=== History ===\n\nThere were a few things leading up to this.\n\nFirst, updating mm_cpumask() was observed to be too expensive, so it was\nmade lazier.  But being lazy caused too many unnecessary IPIs to CPUs\ndue to the now-lazy mm_cpumask().  So code was added to cull\nmm_cpumask() periodically[2].  But that culling was a bit too aggressive\nand skipped sending TLB flushes to CPUs that need them.  So here we are\nagain.\n\n=== Problem ===\n\nThe too-aggressive code in should_flush_tlb() strikes in this window:\n\n\t// Turn on IPIs for this CPU/mm combination, but only\n\t// if should_flush_tlb() agrees:\n\tcpumask_set_cpu(cpu, mm_cpumask(next));\n\n\tnext_tlb_gen = atomic64_read(&next->context.tlb_gen);\n\tchoose_new_asid(next, next_tlb_gen, &new_asid, &need_flush);\n\tload_new_mm_cr3(need_flush);\n\t// ^ After 'need_flush' is set to false, IPIs *MUST*\n\t// be sent to this CPU and not be ignored.\n\n        this_cpu_write(cpu_tlbstate.loaded_mm, next);\n\t// ^ Not until this point does should_flush_tlb()\n\t// become true!\n\nshould_flush_tlb() will suppress TLB flushes between load_new_mm_cr3()\nand writing to 'loaded_mm', which is a window where they should not be\nsuppressed.  Whoops.\n\n=== Solution ===\n\nThankfully, the fuzzy \"just about to write CR3\" window is already marked\nwith loaded_mm==LOADED_MM_SWITCHING.  Simply checking for that state in\nshould_flush_tlb() is sufficient to ensure that the CPU is targeted with\nan IPI.\n\nThis will cause more TLB flush IPIs.  But the window is relatively small\nand I do not expect this to cause any kind of measurable performance\nimpact.\n\nUpdate the comment where LOADED_MM_SWITCHING is written since it grew\nyet another user.\n\nPeter Z also raised a concern that should_flush_tlb() might not observe\n'loaded_mm' and 'is_lazy' in the same order that switch_mm_irqs_off()\nwrites them.  Add a barrier to ensure that they are observed in the\norder they are written.\n\n## Affected\n\n- `Linux >= 848b5815177582de0e1d0118725378e0fbadca20 < 12f703811af043d32b1c8a30001b2fa04d5cd0ac`\n- `Linux >= b47002ed65ade940839b7f439ff4a194e7d5ec28 < 02ad4ce144bd27f71f583f667fdf3b3ba0753477`\n- `Linux >= a04fe3bfc71e28009e20357b79df1e8ef7c9d600 < d41072906abec8bb8e01ed16afefbaa558908c89`\n- `Linux >= 3dbe889a1b829b4c07e0836ff853fe649e51ce4f < d87392094f96e162fa5fa5a8640d70cc0952806f`\n- `Linux >= 6db2526c1d694c91c6e05e2f186c085e9460f202 < 399ec9ca8fc4999e676ff89a90184ec40031cf59`\n- `Linux >= 6db2526c1d694c91c6e05e2f186c085e9460f202 < fea4e317f9e7e1f449ce90dedc27a2d2a95bee5a`\n- `Linux d1347977661342cb09a304a17701eb2d4aa21dec`\n- `Linux >= 5.15.179 < 5.15.183`\n- `Linux >= 6.1.129 < 6.1.139`\n- `Linux >= 6.6.79 < 6.6.91`\n- `Linux >= 6.12.16 < 6.12.29`\n- `Linux >= 6.13.4 < 6.14`\n- `Linux 6.14`\n\n## Remediation\n\nRefer to the linked advisories for vendor-supplied fixes and affected version ranges.","depth":"twilight","depthScore":43,"depthScoreParts":{"impact":42.9,"likelihood":0,"exploitation":0,"ransomware":0},"changes":[]}